maddogdrivethru.net
http://maddogdrivethru.net/

Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War
http://maddogdrivethru.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20435
Page 2 of 2

Author:  nero [ Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War

abradley wrote:
nero wrote:
Watch the video instead of derailing the thread to theology. :twisted:

Watch up, or shut up. ;)
You brought up the 'Angels on the point of a pin.'

Considering Angels are said to have no substance, I'd guess billions +.

But it ain't that simple, there are other things that enter into it.

Oh, just shut up.

If you want to discuss, watch the video I linked. Else, leave.

Author:  Kameolontti [ Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War

It's always good to contribute to two dozen different *video threads* about them being based on a video and then get all butthurt when your *video thread* receives a mere notion of how you've been personally dealing with them in the past.

Oh right. They were old MEN and you had a WOMAN. I guess by your logic it's 100% different story then but not all of us think like cucks do.

Author:  jwilkerson [ Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War

Hecque,

Russia should not have fought in the first world war ...

Germany should not have fought in the first world war ...

France should not have fought in the first world war ...

:)

Author:  nero [ Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War

jwilkerson wrote:
Hecque,

Russia should not have fought in the first world war ...

Germany should not have fought in the first world war ...

France should not have fought in the first world war ...

:)

Russia's defeat gave Finland independence, German defeat saved Finland not to be a German vassal. That is my take for Russia.

But did you watch the video, so that we can discuss about Britain?

Author:  nero [ Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War

Kameolontti wrote:
It's always good to contribute to two dozen different *video threads* about them being based on a video and then get all butthurt when your *video thread* receives a mere notion of how you've been personally dealing with them in the past.

Oh right. They were old MEN and you had a WOMAN. I guess by your logic it's 100% different story then but not all of us think like cucks do.

:victory salute with one finger:


Author:  Anthropoid [ Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War

jwilkerson wrote:
Hecque,

Russia should not have fought in the first world war ...

Germany should not have fought in the first world war ...

France should not have fought in the first world war ...

:)


So true. Just about the only one who arguably "benefited" was the U.S. and Japan! Even pretty marginal degree of benefit for U.S. given WWII

Author:  nero [ Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War

Anthropoid wrote:
jwilkerson wrote:
Hecque,

Russia should not have fought in the first world war ...

Germany should not have fought in the first world war ...

France should not have fought in the first world war ...

:)


So true. Just about the only one who arguably "benefited" was the U.S. and Japan! Even pretty marginal degree of benefit for U.S. given WWII

Gavrilo Princip should not have assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo.

Interesting discussion with people who have not watched the video to talk about. :roll:

Oh well, what the hell. :?

Author:  Anthropoid [ Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War

Well, the fact that Archduke Ferdinand and his wife were murdered didn't exactly BEHOOVE Great Britain to join the fray. Hell, it didn't even necessarily behoove the French to join in, though in their specific context it is much more understandable that they DID join the fray. The fact the Russians were encouraging Serbian separatists means they got caught with their fingers in the cookie jar so to speak. Obviously, it would have been MUCH, _MUCH_ better for the Tsar and his family (and the millions who became victims of the Civil War and subsequent Commie purges) if Russia had stayed out of it too!

But apparently Slavic affinity is stronger than common sense.

Germany WAS spoiling for a fight with Russia as they understood that was the largest long-term threat, so the last thing the Russians should have been doing is aggravating the Austrians by encouraging Serbian separatists. France wanted revenge. Austria-Hungary were just kind of fecklessly being led by the nose. The Brits flipped a coin and decided to hop in.

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/