Conclusion, prepare yourself to hear a lot of hate speech, slander and defamation. Anything that stops short of directly inciting violence against Trump is a good thing!
As the dinosaurs were going extinct, they became confused, fearful, angry and lashed out, not knowing their era was over. #angrylibtards
You cannot give reputation so soon after your last.
Return to the previous page
Where it is sane, I am fully in favor of critical commentary on Trump; it is just so RARE and especially from anyone who fundamentally disagrees with his perspectives in general.
In another thread on here, I noted that I don't really approve of the Yemen attack he recently gave the thumbs up on. But not because I suffer the false notion that anyone in Yemen deserves to be left alive; as far as I'm concerned, at this point ALL Muslims are suspects in the global Islamic Supremacist movement, and any specific Muslim convincing me otherwise is contingent on them going out of their way to show me that they hold the values that I hold dear (those of Western Civilization) as a higher priority than they do the 700 year old medieval, sexist, misogynist, pedophile, tribal-warmongering superstition to which they adhere.
To put it quite simply: if you are a Muslim, I do NOT trust you, unless you can prove to me that you deserve my trust DESPITE being a Muslim.
I would've said the same thing in 1937 about a German. Would I have been wrong a good deal of the time? Yes. Probably still 20 or 25% of the German population were not yet truly complicit and culpable at that point. Even if that number were only 49% it is arguably the ONLY pragmatic position. When a population has been "taken over" by violent hate ideology, and even when a large fraction of that population are not directly supportive of the specific violent hate activities, it is a basic act of common sense to be skeptical, cautious even suspicious of ALL members of that population.
Being suspicious does not mean: engaging in vigilantism or any other form of extrajudicial or illegal activity. But it does mean taking anything such folks say with a very large grain of salt and "keeping your eye on them." Applying a blanket ban on the entrance of all Muslims, conditional with a set of conditions to permit any Muslim entrance based on their performance in a battery of screening measures (one might even consider the use of cutting edge implicit attitudes experimental methods . . . but simply well-trained customs and immigration staff might be sufficient) seems perfectly reasonable to me. It has nothing to do with "racism" nor even with "relgionism" or any other "ism." It has to do with being pragmatic. When you are at war, you do not afford people who are from the same population as your enemy the same privileges as if they were from an friendly or merely neutral population.