maddogdrivethru.net

Open all night
It is currently Sat Aug 18, 2018 8:30 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


It's the Gulag of Fun



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 9:36 pm 
Offline
buck private
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:01 am
Posts: 15548
Reputation points: 11978
IMHO A good place to start understanding Islam is http://www.muhammadanism.org/ a site with info on most aspects of the Religion and it's founder.

When it quotes from Islam's Holy Book and writings it uses the three interpreters recognized as most correct by Muslim scholars.

It's not been updated since 2009. It's very informative about what Muslims see as justification for their actions.

_________________
"Experience must be our only guide. Reason may mislead us."
John Dickinson
Constitutional Convention of 1787


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 12:03 pm 
Offline
Sergeant Major

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:19 pm
Posts: 26646
Reputation points: 20000
No need for "updates". Nothing has changed since the Sunni-Shittite split.

All that is needed is a "Current Fatwa" page to see who or what group of people one is permitted to murder..God wlling.

_________________
I haven't figured out how to the block thingy works but if anyone alters my posts I will become really, really angry and throw monkey poop out of my cage.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 12:09 pm 
Offline
Sergeant Major

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:19 pm
Posts: 26646
Reputation points: 20000
The current list:

Jews
Christians (including Mormons)
Buddhists
Zoroastrians
Janists
Polytheistic vermin
Atheists
Sikhs
Yazidi
Sufis
Shittites

Americans
Brits
Frenchmen
Israelis (see above)
Germans (sometimes)
Han (Chinese)
Russians (of course)
Fillipiinos

Salman Rushdie (if you can find him)
Apostates
Any Kuffar not mentioned above if you feel like it

_________________
I haven't figured out how to the block thingy works but if anyone alters my posts I will become really, really angry and throw monkey poop out of my cage.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 1:03 pm 
Offline
buck private
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:01 am
Posts: 15548
Reputation points: 11978
jack t ripper wrote:
{Snip}

Quote:
Media Is Still Portraying Islamic Terrorists as ‘Aggrieved’ Victims
By Raymond Ibrahim December 29, 2017
https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/m ... d-victims/
chat 6 comments
This undated photo provided by the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission shows Akayed Ullah, the suspect in the explosion near New York's Times Square on Monday, Dec. 11, 2017. Ullah is suspected of strapping a pipe bomb to his body and setting off the crude device in a passageway under 42nd Street between Seventh and Eighth Avenues, injuring himself and a few others. (New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission via AP)

The mainstream media’s approach to and apologias for Islamic terrorism have become as predictable as they are farcical.

In a recent piece titled “A Mysterious Act of Mercy by the Subway Bombing Suspect,” New York Times reporter Jeffrey Gettleman portrays would-be suicide bomber Akayed Ullah -- whose foiled attempt under Times Square could have massacred countless Americans -- as just another Muslim youth angered at and responding to the mistreatment of Muslims. Ullah was just a Muslim with legitimate “grievances” against the United States:

Before Akayed Ullah returned home to New York from his native Bangladesh … he had one last thing to do -- an all-night bus ride by himself to help Rohingya refugees [Muslims]. After visiting relatives here in the capital city, Dhaka, he traveled across the country, slept in a mosque and under a tree, and passed out a few hundred dollars of medicine in the crowded refugee camps.

“When he left [America], he seemed happy,” said his mother-in-law, Mahfuza Akhter. “But when he returned, he was so upset. He said those people were living in hell, each and every minute.”

“That lonely trip across Bangladesh in September remains a mystery,” Gettleman opines, wondering whether Ullah was “following his own heart, reflecting some sort of inner struggle as he headed toward his first known act of violence and self-destruction.” Gettleman based this on “extensive interviews with more than a dozen friends, relatives and acquaintances,” all of whom say that the Muslim youth was “outraged by injustices inflicted on Muslims. He was also described by several people who know him well as loving and giving.”

According to Gettleman, such claims “still leave a hole as to why Mr. Ullah did this.”

And so it goes. To anyone paying attention, the NYT’s portrayal of Ullah is virtually boilerplate; the duplicate structure of the portrayals of all Islamic terrorists who strike at the United States.

Recall, for instance, when Abdul Razak Ali Artan -- an 18-year-old Muslim refugee from Somalia who was receiving aid from Catholic charities -- rammed his car into a building at Ohio State University, then got out and stabbed people with a butcher knife, hospitalizing 13 people. CNN, NBC, the Washington Post, and many others sought to rationalize Artan’s violence by citing one of his Facebook posts. Artan had written: “Seeing my fellow Muslims being tortured, raped and killed in Burma led to a boiling point. I can’t take it anymore.”

The problem with both Ullah’s and Artan’s supposed “grievances” is twofold. First, the obvious: how, exactly, does terrorizing and slaughtering Americans avenge the plight of Rohingya Muslims in Burma/Myanmar? If Ullah and Artan were primarily motivated by the suffering of the Rohingya, shouldn’t they have sought to terrorize and kill Burmese?

Secondly, media and other “experts” misleadingly portray such Muslim terrorists as being motivated by the “love” they feel for fellow Muslims. (Recall former CIA official Michael Scheuer describing Osama bin Laden as a man of love, comparing him to Robin Hood.) In truth, discussions of this “love” ignore that the practice is rooted in the expression of Islamic supremacism.

It’s the flipside to the Islamic doctrine of Loyalty and Enmity. Just as Muslims are obligated to hate and fight non-Muslims, so are they “obligated to befriend a believer -- even if he is oppressive and violent toward you -- while he [the Muslim] must be hostile to the infidel -- even if he is liberal and kind to you” (The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 64). As the Koran (48:29) more succinctly puts it, Muslims “are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves.”

Ullah’s terror attempt is a byproduct of Islamic teachings that declare the non-Muslim enemy number one, regardless of any real or imagined grievances.

The reason Ullah struck the U.S. as opposed to Myanmar is probably because the latter has more “draconian” security measures that made America an easier target. Ironically, Bangladeshi authorities came much closer to the mark than the New York Times did. Monirul Islam, the chief of Bangladesh’s counterterrorism police operations, said Ullah “was closely following several jihadist websites. “He seemed to have this hatred for America. … We’re not exactly sure where it came from.”

While the answer is self-evident -- the hatred came from jihadi websites that preach hate for all infidels -- at least Bangladeshi authorities did not offer silly, sappy motivations such as “grievances.” Meanwhile, “trusted” Western media continued with its efforts to portray Islamic aggressors as tragic victims.

_________________
"Experience must be our only guide. Reason may mislead us."
John Dickinson
Constitutional Convention of 1787


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 2:56 pm 
Offline
Sergeant Major

Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 7:44 am
Posts: 11384
Reputation points: 15300
All you need to know.



Just Say No.

_________________
“The gap in EU finances arising from the United Kingdom’s withdrawal and from the financing needs of new priorities need to be clearly acknowledged.” - Mario Monti


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 4:40 am 
Offline
buck private
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:01 am
Posts: 15548
Reputation points: 11978
EUBanana wrote:
All you need to know.



Just Say No.
Good, we non-Muslims can use all the help we can get.

_________________
"Experience must be our only guide. Reason may mislead us."
John Dickinson
Constitutional Convention of 1787


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:29 am 
Offline
buck private
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:01 am
Posts: 15548
Reputation points: 11978

Excellent

_________________
"Experience must be our only guide. Reason may mislead us."
John Dickinson
Constitutional Convention of 1787


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 4:45 am 
Offline
Staff Sergeant

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:41 pm
Posts: 3271
Reputation points: 4670
abradley wrote:
Excellent


He's a good orator.

Assuming he is correct that Islam does not work in democracy, and can not be reformed - can there be any other solution to the problem than obliteration of Islam? A Endlösung...?


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:00 am 
Offline
Sergeant Major
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:06 pm
Posts: 11288
Location: inside your worst nightmare
Reputation points: 14720
wulfir wrote:
abradley wrote:
Excellent


He's a good orator.

Assuming he is correct that Islam does not work in democracy, and can not be reformed - can there be any other solution to the problem than obliteration of Islam? A Endlösung...?


We already know the answer to that question as it was applied to fascism, communist totalitarianism.

Do we really need to wait for the "experimental results" to reach a functional conclusion with respect to any other ideologies which are framed in terms completely counter to those of Western secular humanism?

Loving individuals and throwing them off of buildings because they do things with their private parts you disapprove of are mutually exclusive.

_________________
Anthro's NSFW Thread


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Muhammadanism
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:22 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:41 pm
Posts: 3271
Reputation points: 4670
Anthropoid wrote:
We already know the answer to that question as it was applied to fascism, communist totalitarianism.


In theory it could be done - unless they are actually right and their God creator-idea happens to be the right one. Then I imagine the odds are against us.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group