maddogdrivethru.net

Open all night
It is currently Fri Dec 14, 2018 2:21 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 983 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 99  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:12 am 
Offline
Sergeant Major

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:19 pm
Posts: 27914
Reputation points: 20000
Grassley thinks he is going to go home, have some warm milk and watch Leave it to Beaver.

_________________
I haven't figured out how to the block thingy works but if anyone alters my posts I will become really, really angry and throw monkey poop out of my cage.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 2:26 pm 
Offline
Sergeant Major

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 4:43 pm
Posts: 16127
Reputation points: 720
jack t ripper wrote:
Grassley thinks he is going to go home, have some warm milk and watch Leave it to Beaver.

Wide open beavers. :lol:

The signal of NYC fire brigade, before the now slogan.



No shame, no mercy. ;)

_________________
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt

Mit der Dummheit kämpfen selbst Götter vergebens.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:50 pm 
Offline
buck private
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:01 am
Posts: 16330
Reputation points: 13228


And 'What it all means?'


_________________
“Political Language… is Designed to Make Lies Sound Truthful… and to Give an Appearance of Solidity to Pure Wind.” — George Orwell


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:35 pm 
Offline
Sergeant Major

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:19 pm
Posts: 27914
Reputation points: 20000
"Leave it to Beaver" is an idealized television show.

_________________
I haven't figured out how to the block thingy works but if anyone alters my posts I will become really, really angry and throw monkey poop out of my cage.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:29 pm 
Offline
Sergeant Major
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:50 pm
Posts: 31643
Location: West coast of the east coast
Reputation points: 20000
https://www.breitbart.com/big-governmen ... -thursday/

Quote:
Report: Grassley Accepts Kavanaugh Accuser’s Demand to Testify Thursday

Christine Blasey Ford, the California psychology professor who recently leveled an allegation of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, has agreed to testify before members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, according to reports.



Continued at above link

Why do I sense Grassley and the rest of the caving on most of her demands?

_________________
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.
- misattributed to Alexis De Tocqueville

No representations made as to the accuracy of info in posted news articles or links


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:30 pm 
Offline
Sergeant Major
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:50 pm
Posts: 31643
Location: West coast of the east coast
Reputation points: 20000
By the end of the hearing they will be supporting Professor Ford for the SCOTUS vacancy...

_________________
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.
- misattributed to Alexis De Tocqueville

No representations made as to the accuracy of info in posted news articles or links


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:01 pm 
Offline
Sergeant Major
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:06 pm
Posts: 12097
Location: inside your worst nightmare
Reputation points: 16211
Well if she can say, or show, or do something which can PROVE, not merely claim, but prove that Kavanaugh engaged in criminal behavior then we should all be thankful for her to provide that evidence, as it would save our nation from having a criminal on the SCOTUS.

But what could she possibly say, show, or do in "testimony" about an alleged crime that occurred 36 years ago, and which has never before been brought before law enforcement as a complaint? No physical evidence, no other witnesses, no corroborating evidence of any sort . . . If anyone seriously believes that something this woman can say, show or do in "testimony" before the Senate over the course of a couple of hours can PROVE what has been alleged to have occurred so long ago in such vague details, WHAT is it that they imagine that would amount to?

The real problem here is that the SUPREMACY of empiricism, law enforcement, due process, and jurisprudence in our society is being put BEHIND the political correct #MeToo charade of "women are incapable of lying about sex and violence stuff." BULLSHIT! Women can lie and scheme and cheat with the best of them, and nothing about their sex-based vulnerabilities changes that.

We have got to be able to partition salient matters, but the Demcorruptocrats have no interest in that. Honestly, it is a travesty that she is being allowed to "testify" at all, though the real travesty is that there are powerful elements within our society (various media and information technology and activism industries, along with "The Left") who would throw a Chernobyl style hissy fit if they didn't get their way, and have the stupid bitch do her little act in front of the Senate. Its like some goddamn children's game where little girls are playing "house" and handing each other mudballs and saying "Here is your piece of pie, and here is your piece of pie . . ." and one little girls gets bent cause she didn't get as big a piece of pie and throws a fit, and mud gets thrown in someone's eye and the cops get called and the parents are brought to the station and the "assailant's" parents are arrested and the entire neighborhood is in uproar . . . and meanwhile it all could've been avoided if one of the ADULTS had simply stepped in and said: "Hey! STFU you little ninnies! Its mud, NOT pies. Now play nice or you all have to go home."

_________________
Anthro's NSFW Thread


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:02 pm 
Offline
buck private
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:01 am
Posts: 16330
Reputation points: 13228
As I posted earlier, give them what they want viewtopic.php?p=338669#p338669

Then elect him after the mid terms.

_________________
“Political Language… is Designed to Make Lies Sound Truthful… and to Give an Appearance of Solidity to Pure Wind.” — George Orwell


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 2:39 am 
Offline
Sergeant Major
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:50 pm
Posts: 31643
Location: West coast of the east coast
Reputation points: 20000
abradley wrote:
As I posted earlier, give them what they want viewtopic.php?p=338669#p338669

Then elect him after the mid terms.


I watched the video.

I would not bet the house on what Dick Morris predicts.

Here are some of his past predictions:

Quote:
Morris said it's "very possible" that President Obama will drop out of the 2012 race at the behest of Democratic leaders in Congress:


Quote:
Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice will likely face off against each other in the 2008 presidential elections. Morris literally wrote the book on this prediction, Condi vs. Hillary. Outcome: Neither candidates ran in the 2008 general election. But Morris's book is available to buy on Amazon for $0.01.


Quote:
Republican Rick Lazio will beat Democrat Hillary Clinton for New York's U.S. Senate seat. In 2000, Morris went on The O'Reilly Factor and said "I think Lazio is, at this point, more likely to win it than Hillary, because, if Hillary is at 48 percent -- or even at 49 percent, or even at 50 percent -- a lot of her vote of minorities, a lot of her -- who have no real reason to vote in the presidential race." Outcome: Hillary Clinton won the Senate race.


Those three predictions here: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... gs/337299/

---

Quote:
DICK MORRIS: A Romney blowout

"It will be the biggest surprise in recent American political history … It will rekindle the whole question on why the media played this race as a nailbiter where in fact Romney’s going to win by quite a bit." –Nov. 5


https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/11/07/wo ... n-edition/

:roll:

---------

Quote:
3. In 2010, Morris said Republicans would pick up more than 80 seats in the House and regain the Senate majority in the midterm elections.

He said House pickups could "go as high as 100." In fact, Republicans picked up only 63 seats. And they did not win a Senate majority.


Quote:
4. He thought Kirsten Gillibrand was "beatable" in 2008.

In a particularly damning display of delusion before the 2010 midterm elections, Morris said in September that Kirsten Gillibrand was still "beatable" in the New York Senate race. She won the race by 26 points.


She is still a Senator today.

Quote:
7. Some of his 2012 Senate predictions were also terrible.

He said that Republican Senate candidates Tom Smith in Pennsylvania, Josh Mandel in Ohio, and George Allen in Virginia would help Republicans gain back control of the Senate. Smith lost by 9 points, while Allen and Mandel lost by 5 points each.


Those three predictions here: https://www.businessinsider.com/dick-mo ... cnn-2013-2

Fox News let him go after his 2012 prediction of a "Romney landslide"

----------

Quote:
Rubio as Romney's running mate

Obama's victory was not the only profoundly wrong prediction that Morris had about the 2012 election. That same year, Morris predicted that Romney would pick Sen. Marco Rubio as his running mate.


https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/ ... n-mistakes

---------------

So I would not put any stock in Morris' predictions.
I would not even bet the spare change that I have in my pocket.

If they lose the Senate then you will not get another chance at Kavanaugh, or someone similiarly conservative for a while.

_________________
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.
- misattributed to Alexis De Tocqueville

No representations made as to the accuracy of info in posted news articles or links


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kavanaugh Supreme Court nominee
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 2:58 am 
Offline
Sergeant Major
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:50 pm
Posts: 31643
Location: West coast of the east coast
Reputation points: 20000
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/0 ... me-changer

Quote:
BREAKING. Kavanaugh Accuser’s Third Witness Is Located And Her Testimony Is A Game Changer

Posted at 9:57 pm on September 22, 2018 by streiff

So far, Christine Ford, the California professor who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of groping her 37 years ago, has been less than forthcoming with anything that approaches a verifiable detail of her experience. She doesn’t know what year it happened. She doesn’t know what month it happened. She doesn’t know where the house was or whose parents it belonged to. She doesn’t know how she got home. Those are huge, gaping holes in any account of anything and yet, Ford’s supports shamelessly contend that this is a natural reaction to this simulacrum of a trauma. One bit of information she has provided, oddly enough, are the names of the other three teens in the house at the time.

Two of them are male. Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth have both provided letters, via their attorneys, to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of any part such as the one Ford describes.


There is a third witness, the young woman that accompanied her to the alleged party and who the young Christine Blasey abandoned in a house filled with drunk males who, according to Ford, had rape on their minds. Now the young woman has been located. And she has provided a statement, by way of her attorney:

CNN has learned that the committee has reached out to a longtime friend of Ford named Leland Ingham Keyser.

On Saturday night, her lawyer, Howard Walsh, released a statement to CNN and the Senate Judiciary Committee..

“Simply put,” Walsh said, “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”

The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford’s.

Keyser is the latest person alleged to be at the party to say she has no recollection of it.

“I understand that you have been identified as an individual who was in attendance at a party that occurred circa 1982 described in a recent Washington Post article,” a committee staffer wrote Keyser earlier this week.



Ben Domenech

@bdomenech
"Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford." ... "The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford's."https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/09/22/politics/kavanaugh-ford-accuser-nomination/index.html?__twitter_impression=true …

9:29 PM - Sep 22, 2018


So now we have three witnesses, plus Brett Kavanaugh, agree that this party never happened, much less the incident. And all have done so under penalty of prosecution for providing a false statement to Congress. This means the only person not on the record is Christine Ford.

Jonathan H. Adler

@jadler1969
Well, this is interesting.
Worth noting that false communications to SJC are punishable under 18 USC 1001 https://twitter.com/keithcrc/status/1043663681245143046

9:31 PM - Sep 22, 2018


What makes this so sweet is that Ms. Keyser seems to have once been Mrs. Bob Beckel.

It seems that Ford can add one additional symptom to her unique variety of sexual trauma…no one else remembers anything about the event either.


Also interesting, according to a another tweet in the above article, is that this lady Keyser was once married to Bob Beckel (a life long die hard true blue Democrat).

The CNN Article regarding this:
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/09/22/poli ... ssion=true

Ford's attorney trying to spin this:

Quote:
Ford's lawyer Debra Katz said in response to Keyser's attorney's statement that it makes sense that Keyser wouldn't remember, because Ford has said she did not share her allegations "publicly or with anyone for years."

"It's not surprising that Ms Keyser has no recollection of the evening as they did not discuss it," Katz said in a statement. "It's also unremarkable that Ms. Keyser does not remember attending a specific gathering 30 years ago at which nothing of consequence happened to her. Dr. Ford of course will never forget this gathering because of what happened to her there."

_________________
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.
- misattributed to Alexis De Tocqueville

No representations made as to the accuracy of info in posted news articles or links


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 983 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 99  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group