Bye bye Scott

nero · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 6:52 am

To remember Pruitt's sprint in EPA:

Interesting to see the substitute Trump will nominate. It can't be easy to exceed what Pruitt has achieved in EPA.

chijohnaok · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 8:40 am

nero wrote:

To remember Pruitt's sprint in EPA:

Interesting to see the substitute Trump will nominate. It can't be easy to exceed what Pruitt has achieved in EPA.

Heard a report on the radio a couple days ago regarding this.

I believe that they have the current deputy director of the EPA slated as Pruitt’s replacement.
The man has the same philosophy on how the EPA should be run but none of the baggage with trips, and other image things that Pruitt screwed up with.

And since the replacement is the Deputy Director he has likely already gone through review and approval by the Senate.

So in other words Nero, you will see a new Pruitt but without his negative baggage.

jack t ripper · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 10:22 am

Scott was targeted by NPR and every "environmental organization" on the planet. None of them give a shit about travel expenses...it was all about opposing Trump's agenda. That's why Pruitt got the job. He agreed with defanging the EPA rolling back Obama's agenda.

Nobody here gives a shit about Scott Pruitt. Pruitt is gone and we are still out of the disastrous Paris accord. :lol:

Another solider fills his rank.

nero · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 10:36 am

jack t ripper wrote:

Scott was targeted by NPR and every "environmental organization" on the planet. None of them give a shit about travel expenses...it was all about opposing Trump's agenda. That's why Pruitt got the job. He agreed with defanging the EPA rolling back Obama's agenda.

Nobody here gives a shit about Scott Pruitt. Pruitt is gone and we are still out of the disastrous Paris accord. :lol:

Another solider fills his rank.

When do you expect having leaded gasoline and acid rains back? :roll:

NefariousKoel · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 10:42 am

nero wrote:

jack t ripper wrote:

Scott was targeted by NPR and every "environmental organization" on the planet. None of them give a shit about travel expenses...it was all about opposing Trump's agenda. That's why Pruitt got the job. He agreed with defanging the EPA rolling back Obama's agenda.

Nobody here gives a shit about Scott Pruitt. Pruitt is gone and we are still out of the disastrous Paris accord. :lol:

Another solider fills his rank.

When do you expect having leaded gasoline and acid rains back? :roll:

About the same time all the unicorn farts warm the atmosphere .0000001 percent F (avg).

:roll:

nero · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 10:58 am

NefariousKoel wrote:

nero wrote:

...
When do you expect having leaded gasoline and acid rains back? :roll:

About the same time all the unicorn farts warm the atmosphere .0000001 percent F (avg).

:roll:

|
|
v

chijohnaok · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 11:22 am

nero wrote:

jack t ripper wrote:

Scott was targeted by NPR and every "environmental organization" on the planet. None of them give a shit about travel expenses...it was all about opposing Trump's agenda. That's why Pruitt got the job. He agreed with defanging the EPA rolling back Obama's agenda.

Nobody here gives a shit about Scott Pruitt. Pruitt is gone and we are still out of the disastrous Paris accord. :lol:

Another solider fills his rank.

When do you expect having leaded gasoline and acid rains back? :roll:

So Nero, if you believe that leaded gasoline is coming back in the United States, then please provide a link to any ruling, public statement or something similar from the EPA showing its intent to relax the prohibition on leaded gas.

mdiehl · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 12:13 pm

I agree with the EPA. I don't understand why people think it's just great when people dump massive amounts of toxic waster into the air and water. I get it why very wealthy people like it because it increases profit margins and they have wealthy enough to not be much affected by the shit.

IMO the EPA is as necessary and important for the defense of the USA as the Dept of Defense.

nero · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 12:19 pm

chijohnaok wrote:

nero wrote:

...
When do you expect having leaded gasoline and acid rains back? :roll:

So Nero, if you believe that leaded gasoline is coming back in the United States, then please provide a link to any ruling, public statement or something similar from the EPA showing its intent to relax the prohibition on leaded gas.

Just logical development; first dismantle EPA, then get rid of all unnecessary regulations like the Clean Air Act.

MAGA

chijohnaok · **Posted:** Sat Jul 07, 2018 12:54 pm

nero wrote:

chijohnaok wrote:

So Nero, if you believe that leaded gasoline is coming back in the United States, then please provide a link to any ruling, public statement or something similar from the EPA showing its intent to relax the prohibition on leaded gas.

Just logical development; first dismantle EPA, then get rid of all unnecessary regulations like the Clean Air Act.

MAGA

So in other words you have no proof that the EPA intends to relax the laws/regulations on leaded gas.
No proposals put forth by the EPA to do so; no draft changes in the laws or regulations; no request for comments on such a proposal.

I suspect that all you have are some talking points that you saw/heard from some Democrat talking head.

Call me when you actually have some proof of this.

maddogdrivethru.net

Bye bye Scott

Who is online